• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            牽著老婆滿街逛

            嚴以律己,寬以待人. 三思而后行.
            GMail/GTalk: yanglinbo#google.com;
            MSN/Email: tx7do#yahoo.com.cn;
            QQ: 3 0 3 3 9 6 9 2 0 .

            C# versus C++ versus Java performance comparison

            轉載自:http://www.proxyfreesurfing.info/browse.php?u=Oi8vZXJpcmVmcm95bnFyLm95YnRmY2JnLnBiei8yMDA5LzAyL3AtaXJlZmhmLXAtaXJlZmhmLXduaW4tY3Jlc2Jlem5hcHIudWd6eQ%3D%3D&b=5&f=norefer

            The performance comparison of C#, Java and C++ was always a controversial subject. Many people who are unfamiliar with JIT'ed environments claimed anything runs on JIT is too slow compared to C++. On the other hand people who actually use Java and C# usually claimed the otherwise that performance impact is negligable. Here's a nice chart I've found that a friend in freenode IRC server pointed me. These benchmarks are done by Matt R Warren (aka Moridin8 in irc.freenode.net) and his original site is http://www.csharp-architect.com


            According to below chart, choosing C++ just for the sake of performance doesn't seem very feasable to me. Remember : Engineers are expensive and servers are not!




            posted on 2011-07-13 14:19 楊粼波 閱讀(868) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用

            久久精品天天中文字幕人妻| 国内精品久久久久久99| 久久久精品人妻一区二区三区四| 久久久久人妻一区精品果冻| 久久亚洲欧美日本精品| 国产成人久久激情91| 久久人人妻人人爽人人爽| 久久精品国产男包| 久久99国产精品久久99小说| 久久人妻少妇嫩草AV蜜桃| 久久久久久亚洲精品影院| 伊人久久亚洲综合影院| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片AV不| 国产69精品久久久久APP下载| 欧美一区二区三区久久综合| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片| 成人妇女免费播放久久久| 久久精品这里热有精品| 超级碰久久免费公开视频| 婷婷久久精品国产| 成人午夜精品无码区久久| 97精品国产91久久久久久| 天天爽天天爽天天片a久久网| 久久精品视屏| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文| 国产精品久久自在自线观看| 久久不见久久见免费影院www日本| www久久久天天com| 日韩久久久久中文字幕人妻| 精品久久久中文字幕人妻| 九九久久99综合一区二区| 麻豆国内精品久久久久久| 狠狠色婷婷久久一区二区| 热久久这里只有精品| 久久精品国产免费观看 | 久久国产精品99精品国产987| 久久午夜免费视频| 久久九九免费高清视频| 久久精品国产亚洲麻豆| 国产成人精品免费久久久久| 久久性精品|