• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            C++&&Linux

            做自己喜歡的事情

              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 聯系 :: 聚合  :: 管理
              3 Posts :: 4 Stories :: 1 Comments :: 0 Trackbacks

            常用鏈接

            留言簿(18)

            我參與的團隊

            搜索

            •  

            最新評論

            閱讀排行榜

            評論排行榜

            原文地址:

            http://tom.preston-werner.com/2010/08/23/readme-driven-development.html


            Readme Driven Development

            23 August 2010 - San Francisco

            I hear a lot of talk these days about TDD and BDD and Extreme Programming and SCRUM and stand up meetings and all kinds of methodologies and techniques for developing better software, but it's all irrelevant unless the software we're building meets the needs of those that are using it. Let me put that another way. A perfect implementation of the wrong specification is worthless. By the same principle a beautifully crafted library with no documentation is also damn near worthless. If your software solves the wrong problem or nobody can figure out how to use it, there's something very bad going on.

            Fine. So how do we solve this problem? It's easier than you think, and it's important enough to warrant its very own paragraph.

            Write your Readme first.

            First. As in, before you write any code or tests or behaviors or stories or ANYTHING. I know, I know, we're programmers, dammit, not tech writers! But that's where you're wrong. Writing a Readme is absolutely essential to writing good software. Until you've written about your software, you have no idea what you'll be coding. Between The Great Backlash Against Waterfall Design and The Supreme Acceptance of Agile Development, something was lost. Don't get me wrong, waterfall design takes things way too far. Huge systems specified in minute detail end up being the WRONG systems specified in minute detail. We were right to strike it down. But what took its place is too far in the other direction. Now we have projects with short, badly written, or entirely missing documentation. Some projects don't even have a Readme!

            This is not acceptable. There must be some middle ground between reams of technical specifications and no specifications at all. And in fact there is. That middle ground is the humble Readme.

            It's important to distinguish Readme Driven Development from Documentation Driven Development. RDD could be considered a subset or limited version of DDD. By restricting your design documentation to a single file that is intended to be read as an introduction to your software, RDD keeps you safe from DDD-turned-waterfall syndrome by punishing you for lengthy or overprecise specification. At the same time, it rewards you for keeping libraries small and modularized. These simple reinforcements go a long way towards driving your project in the right direction without a lot of process to ensure you do the right thing.

            By writing your Readme first you give yourself some pretty significant advantages:

            • Most importantly, you're giving yourself a chance to think through the project without the overhead of having to change code every time you change your mind about how something should be organized or what should be included in the Public API. Remember that feeling when you first started writing automated code tests and realized that you caught all kinds of errors that would have otherwise snuck into your codebase? That's the exact same feeling you'll have if you write the Readme for your project before you write the actual code.

            • As a byproduct of writing a Readme in order to know what you need to implement, you'll have a very nice piece of documentation sitting in front of you. You'll also find that it's much easier to write this document at the beginning of the project when your excitement and motivation are at their highest. Retroactively writing a Readme is an absolute drag, and you're sure to miss all kinds of important details when you do so.

            • If you're working with a team of developers you get even more mileage out of your Readme. If everyone else on the team has access to this information before you've completed the project, then they can confidently start work on other projects that will interface with your code. Without any sort of defined interface, you have to code in serial or face reimplementing large portions of code.

            • It's a lot simpler to have a discussion based on something written down. It's easy to talk endlessly and in circles about a problem if nothing is ever put to text. The simple act of writing down a proposed solution means everyone has a concrete idea that can be argued about and iterated upon.

            Consider the process of writing the Readme for your project as the true act of creation. This is where all your brilliant ideas should be expressed. This document should stand on its own as a testament to your creativity and expressiveness. The Readme should be the single most important document in your codebase; writing it first is the proper thing to do.

            posted on 2011-08-11 18:14 Smile 閱讀(130) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用
            久久人人爽人人爽人人AV东京热| 久久精品无码一区二区无码 | 久久久久久国产精品无码下载| 精品久久久无码中文字幕天天| 合区精品久久久中文字幕一区 | 国产美女亚洲精品久久久综合| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久蜜芽 | 精品熟女少妇aⅴ免费久久| 波多野结衣久久| 美女写真久久影院| 亚洲女久久久噜噜噜熟女| 久久91亚洲人成电影网站| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜av浪潮 | 999久久久免费精品国产| 污污内射久久一区二区欧美日韩| 人妻无码中文久久久久专区| 久久九九久精品国产| 72种姿势欧美久久久久大黄蕉| 久久久久亚洲精品无码网址| 久久久久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩| 久久综合日本熟妇| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久er99热精品一区二区| 久久大香萑太香蕉av| 国产精品丝袜久久久久久不卡| 久久精品亚洲日本波多野结衣| 国产伊人久久| 久久精品国产99久久丝袜| 久久夜色tv网站| 亚洲狠狠综合久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久| 一本色道久久88—综合亚洲精品| 久久久久久久亚洲精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久久久久久久| 狠狠色伊人久久精品综合网| 久久国产精品久久精品国产| 国内精品久久久久久99| 国产精品久久久福利| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕久久 | 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综合五月| 久久国产AVJUST麻豆|