• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            C++&&Linux

            做自己喜歡的事情

              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 聯系 :: 聚合  :: 管理
              3 Posts :: 4 Stories :: 1 Comments :: 0 Trackbacks

            常用鏈接

            留言簿(18)

            我參與的團隊

            搜索

            •  

            最新評論

            閱讀排行榜

            評論排行榜

            原文地址:

            http://tom.preston-werner.com/2010/08/23/readme-driven-development.html


            Readme Driven Development

            23 August 2010 - San Francisco

            I hear a lot of talk these days about TDD and BDD and Extreme Programming and SCRUM and stand up meetings and all kinds of methodologies and techniques for developing better software, but it's all irrelevant unless the software we're building meets the needs of those that are using it. Let me put that another way. A perfect implementation of the wrong specification is worthless. By the same principle a beautifully crafted library with no documentation is also damn near worthless. If your software solves the wrong problem or nobody can figure out how to use it, there's something very bad going on.

            Fine. So how do we solve this problem? It's easier than you think, and it's important enough to warrant its very own paragraph.

            Write your Readme first.

            First. As in, before you write any code or tests or behaviors or stories or ANYTHING. I know, I know, we're programmers, dammit, not tech writers! But that's where you're wrong. Writing a Readme is absolutely essential to writing good software. Until you've written about your software, you have no idea what you'll be coding. Between The Great Backlash Against Waterfall Design and The Supreme Acceptance of Agile Development, something was lost. Don't get me wrong, waterfall design takes things way too far. Huge systems specified in minute detail end up being the WRONG systems specified in minute detail. We were right to strike it down. But what took its place is too far in the other direction. Now we have projects with short, badly written, or entirely missing documentation. Some projects don't even have a Readme!

            This is not acceptable. There must be some middle ground between reams of technical specifications and no specifications at all. And in fact there is. That middle ground is the humble Readme.

            It's important to distinguish Readme Driven Development from Documentation Driven Development. RDD could be considered a subset or limited version of DDD. By restricting your design documentation to a single file that is intended to be read as an introduction to your software, RDD keeps you safe from DDD-turned-waterfall syndrome by punishing you for lengthy or overprecise specification. At the same time, it rewards you for keeping libraries small and modularized. These simple reinforcements go a long way towards driving your project in the right direction without a lot of process to ensure you do the right thing.

            By writing your Readme first you give yourself some pretty significant advantages:

            • Most importantly, you're giving yourself a chance to think through the project without the overhead of having to change code every time you change your mind about how something should be organized or what should be included in the Public API. Remember that feeling when you first started writing automated code tests and realized that you caught all kinds of errors that would have otherwise snuck into your codebase? That's the exact same feeling you'll have if you write the Readme for your project before you write the actual code.

            • As a byproduct of writing a Readme in order to know what you need to implement, you'll have a very nice piece of documentation sitting in front of you. You'll also find that it's much easier to write this document at the beginning of the project when your excitement and motivation are at their highest. Retroactively writing a Readme is an absolute drag, and you're sure to miss all kinds of important details when you do so.

            • If you're working with a team of developers you get even more mileage out of your Readme. If everyone else on the team has access to this information before you've completed the project, then they can confidently start work on other projects that will interface with your code. Without any sort of defined interface, you have to code in serial or face reimplementing large portions of code.

            • It's a lot simpler to have a discussion based on something written down. It's easy to talk endlessly and in circles about a problem if nothing is ever put to text. The simple act of writing down a proposed solution means everyone has a concrete idea that can be argued about and iterated upon.

            Consider the process of writing the Readme for your project as the true act of creation. This is where all your brilliant ideas should be expressed. This document should stand on its own as a testament to your creativity and expressiveness. The Readme should be the single most important document in your codebase; writing it first is the proper thing to do.

            posted on 2011-08-11 18:20 Smile 閱讀(1496) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用 所屬分類: iphone開發
            久久夜色精品国产噜噜麻豆| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨| 久久人人爽人人爽人人av东京热| 久久综合九色综合久99| 久久婷婷色香五月综合激情| 亚洲第一极品精品无码久久| 2021精品国产综合久久| 国産精品久久久久久久| 国产精品中文久久久久久久| www.久久99| 色综合久久夜色精品国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久郑州公司| 久久免费视频观看| 人人妻久久人人澡人人爽人人精品| 久久久无码一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久无码国产| 亚洲欧美日韩中文久久| 久久亚洲国产成人影院网站| 国产精品无码久久久久久| 99精品国产免费久久久久久下载| 国产精品久久久久影院色| 无码乱码观看精品久久| www亚洲欲色成人久久精品| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码aⅴ| 久久99热这里只有精品66| 欧美激情精品久久久久| 久久亚洲春色中文字幕久久久| 久久亚洲av无码精品浪潮| 99久久国产免费福利| 久久久久人妻精品一区二区三区| 婷婷久久五月天| 国产精品久久久久久久久软件 | 精品伊人久久大线蕉色首页| 国产99久久九九精品无码| 国产成人久久精品激情| 久久久久久亚洲精品成人| 久久精品国产亚洲AV大全| 久久99热只有频精品8| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片| 欧洲精品久久久av无码电影| 伊人久久大香线蕉av一区|