• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            linux&c++ R&D

            programing is a pleasure!

            Using std::basic_string the extensible way

            Problem:
            Using std::basic_string the extensible way
            I'm writing a class that contains a string. But I decided to make it
            more extensible and turn it into a class template:
            template<typename CharT>
            class My
            {
                 std::basic_string<CharT> text;
            };

            How do I operate on such a string, so that it will work for any valid
            instantiation of basic_string? For example, I'd like to append some text
            to the end of the string or check if the first letter is lowercase.
            Currently I'm doing:
                 text += "some other text";
            For wstring I should probably do:
                 test += L"some other text";
            How do I do it in a generic way?
            Solution:
            That depends on the meaning of these literals.
            Are these only some selected literals of the
            corresponding character type with a special
            meaning? If so, than a character-depending
            policy/traits class would be reasonable, which
            would be explicitely specialized for the corresponding
            value, e.g.
            template <typename CharT> 
            class MyTraits; 
            template 
            <> 
            struct MyTraits
            <char> 
              
            static const char* append() 
                
            return "some other text"
              }

            }

            template 
            <> 
            struct MyTraits
            <wchar_t> 
              
            static const wchar_t* append() 
                
            return L"some other text"
              }
             
            }

            template
            <typename CharT> 
            class My 

               std::basic_string
            <CharT> text; 
               typedef MyTraits
            <CharT> Traits; 
               
            void foo() 
                  text 
            += Traits::append(); 
               }
             
            }


            Otherwise you could only declare the member
            functions in the My class template and explicitely
            specialize them for the corresponding character
            type:
            template<typename CharT> 
            class My 

               std::basic_string
            <CharT> text; 
            public
               
            void foo(); // Only declared, not defined 
            }

            template
            <> 
            void My<char>::foo() 
              text 
            += "some other text"
            }
             
            template
            <> 
            void My<wchar_t>::foo() 
              text 
            += L"some other text"
            }
             

            In both cases some preprocessor magic
            can help reducing the redundancies.
            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            How about writing a helper function to convert a narrow string literal
            to an arbitrary basic_string<T>: 
               // A template to 'widen' a string literal 
               
            template < class CharT > 
               std::basic_string
            <CharT> widen( char const* str ) 
                 std::basic_stringstream
            < CharT > s; 
                 s 
            << str; return s.str(); 
               }
             
            Then you can 
            do 
               test 
            += widen<char>"foo bar" ); 
            or 
               test 
            += widen<wchar_t>"foo bar" ); 

            as appropriate.
            You could even make it a constructor, but it's probably best to make it
            explicit in the code when you want this widening.

            posted on 2007-04-25 23:39 丑石 閱讀(796) 評論(0)  編輯 收藏 引用 所屬分類: C++ problem and solution

            My Links

            Blog Stats

            News

            常用鏈接

            留言簿(1)

            隨筆分類(13)

            隨筆檔案(17)

            文章檔案(1)

            相冊

            收藏夾(1)

            Friends' blog

            useful sites

            搜索

            積分與排名

            最新評論

            閱讀排行榜

            評論排行榜

            久久精品人成免费| 亚洲国产成人久久综合碰| 三上悠亚久久精品| 99精品久久精品一区二区| 久久久久久久亚洲Av无码| 蜜桃麻豆www久久| 久久久精品人妻无码专区不卡| 亚洲国产日韩欧美久久| 久久婷婷五月综合色高清| 精品久久久久久无码国产| 四虎国产精品成人免费久久 | 国产精品久久免费| 久久国产美女免费观看精品| 久久久久久综合网天天| 精品久久久久国产免费| 久久久无码一区二区三区| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020| 久久人爽人人爽人人片AV| 亚洲欧洲中文日韩久久AV乱码| 成人久久精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产男包| 一级a性色生活片久久无| 久久精品无码一区二区app| 91精品国产乱码久久久久久| 一本一道久久综合狠狠老| 午夜精品久久久内射近拍高清| 久久精品国产亚洲一区二区| 伊人久久大香线蕉av不卡| 亚洲性久久久影院| 国产精品综合久久第一页| 精品国产一区二区三区久久| 亚洲精品无码成人片久久| 久久国内免费视频| 中文字幕久久亚洲一区| 久久有码中文字幕| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久久| 国产一区二区精品久久凹凸| 久久久久九国产精品| 久久国产精品一区| 欧美久久天天综合香蕉伊| 国产精品成人久久久|