• <ins id="pjuwb"></ins>
    <blockquote id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></blockquote>
    <noscript id="pjuwb"></noscript>
          <sup id="pjuwb"><pre id="pjuwb"></pre></sup>
            <dd id="pjuwb"></dd>
            <abbr id="pjuwb"></abbr>

            S.l.e!ep.¢%

            像打了激速一樣,以四倍的速度運轉,開心的工作
            簡單、開放、平等的公司文化;尊重個性、自由與個人價值;
            posts - 1098, comments - 335, trackbacks - 0, articles - 1
              C++博客 :: 首頁 :: 新隨筆 :: 聯系 :: 聚合  :: 管理

            源URL:http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2010-February/002383.html

            意思沒太懂,大概就是Z.E.R.O.M.Q主要是針對服務器間的通信,獲取客戶端連接IP的意義不大

            Hi Fred,
            
            >>> Just one question remains : were can I grab in the server
            >>> environment the IP address and portnumber of the sending client ?
            >> No way to do that at the moment, other than doing it at the app level
            >> (make up a client ID / use the IP address and stick it in the
            >> message).
            
            Let me give some background here.
            
            Simply said: 0MQ should manage connections for you. Your application 
            should be agnostic about exact location/identity of the peers. If you 
            want to work on the level of individual connections, use BSD sockets 
            rather than 0MQ.
            
            More complex answer: The issue has to do with scaling 0MQ into internet 
            scales. What you want to know is the identity of the peer who sent the 
            message. You are not interested in any middleboxes that may be on the 
            way (like zmq_forwarder etc.) Thus, getting IP address we've received 
            the message from is useless - it's IP address of the previous hop. Also, 
            if IP address is used as the identity, two applications running on the 
            same box would look exactly the same. Same application bound to several 
            network interfaces would look different depending on how exactly you are 
            connected to it. Etc.
            
            At the moment, the only thing you can do is to choose a name for your 
            application and fill it into the message. In easy to modify 0MQ to do 
            the thing for you, however, it's not a conceptual solution.
            
            Real solution still requires a lot of research work. Feel free to start 
            the discussion though.
            
            > OK, but that's (at least for me) not thrustworthy. Like SMTP telling me 
            > who they are. ;-)
            
            What you would consider trustworthy, what kind of attacks should it be 
            resistent to, etc.
            
            > You don't mind if I take a look at the sources to see whether it is 
            > doable for me ?
            
            Sure. Go for it. Any experimentation is valuable! The source is licensed 
            under LGPL so you can modify it in any way given that you publish the 
            result under LGPL.
            
            Martin
            久久午夜电影网| 久久精品国产男包| 国内精品久久人妻互换| 欧美黑人激情性久久| 久久精品成人国产午夜| 久久综合一区二区无码| 一本一本久久A久久综合精品| 狠狠色丁香久久综合婷婷| 久久中文字幕无码专区| 99久久久国产精品免费无卡顿| 久久AⅤ人妻少妇嫩草影院| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区久久 | 久久精品亚洲日本波多野结衣| 久久综合久久综合九色| 亚洲精品国精品久久99热一| 人人狠狠综合久久亚洲婷婷| 亚洲精品无码久久久影院相关影片| 久久国产高清字幕中文| 无码国内精品久久人妻蜜桃| 久久国产成人| 99久久久久| 亚洲成色999久久网站| 午夜人妻久久久久久久久| 久久99热这里只频精品6| 久久青青草原亚洲av无码| 久久婷婷国产麻豆91天堂| 国产综合久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲AV高清热| 无码专区久久综合久中文字幕| 久久久久久精品免费看SSS| 久久中文字幕无码专区 | 亚洲AV无一区二区三区久久 | 久久午夜免费视频| 欧美久久一区二区三区| 精品久久久久中文字幕一区| 久久香蕉一级毛片| 久久国产精品二国产精品| 久久精品国产亚洲一区二区三区| 国产午夜电影久久| 久久黄色视频| 久久综合色老色|