锘??xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>亚洲一区二区三区日本久久九,三级三级久久三级久久,亚洲色婷婷综合久久http://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/category/7740.htmlAlgorithm, Mathematica, 璁$畻鏈虹瀛? C++, photography, GNU/Linux鐨勮璁虹┖闂?/description>zh-cnSun, 03 Aug 2008 16:19:26 GMTSun, 03 Aug 2008 16:19:26 GMT60Issue70http://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/archive/2008/08/03/57911.htmlFreePeterFreePeterSun, 03 Aug 2008 14:48:00 GMThttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/archive/2008/08/03/57911.htmlhttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/comments/57911.htmlhttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/archive/2008/08/03/57911.html#Feedback0http://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/comments/commentRss/57911.htmlhttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/services/trackbacks/57911.htmlDATE: 2008-8-2 17:18:18
鎻愮翰錛?br>鏈変繚鐣欏悓鎰?br>Body Paragraph: 1. 鏇存柊棰嗗鑰呮潵淇濇寔媧誨姏 i. 闀挎湡澶勪簬鏉冨姏楂樺嘲瀹規槗鐙柇/鑵愬寲銆?br>ii. 鏂伴矞瑙傜偣涓庢柟娉曟敞鍏?br> 2. 5騫存槸涓笉閿欑殑period : 澶煭涓嶇ǔ瀹氾紝澶暱娌℃晥鏋溿?br>3. Neverthelss i. 涓嶄竴瀹氶潪瑕?騫?br>ii. 鐗規畩琛屼笟闇瑕佷繚鎸佺ǔ瀹氾細Greenspan 20
In general, I agree with the author that the man in power should be changed regularly. It's crucial to keep the enterprise or government fresh. People may believe that a great leader should be at the position as long as possible to benefit the organization, yet this is not always the case, as discussed followed.
One reason for my fundamental agreement with the speaker is that in order to keep the organization running normally, the leader cannot be always the same. People who are always at the peak of power will easily be arbitrary, or even corrupted. Although this view might seem pessimistic, this is the truth. Since they are always full of power; and few things can restrict them. They will get used to ordering without discussing with others. After a long time, they may forget how to ask others' opinion or how to compromise. Moreover, a man, no matter how great he is, has his own shortage in view. Thus we need some more thoughts and methods to be entered. This can be easily accomplished by changing the leader regularly. Consider the example of Chairman Mao. No one will doubt he is one of the greatest leaders we have ever seen. However, he made a serious mistake in his later time. In contrast, George Washington retired after being the president of U.S. for eight years. History proves his decision was correct.
Another reason why I agree with the claim is that five years is an excellent period. As discussed earlier, we change the leadership mainly in order to revitalize. Thus, if the period is too long, the enterprise may already have been lack of vitality; and the effect will not be so good. On the other side, if the leadership is changed too frequently, for example, one year, it is obviously that the relationship altered too rapidly to become a good workplace. All people are busily becoming familiar with the new environment. Therefore five years is a good balance for the two sides.
We have recognized that the movement of leadership every five years is beneficial; nevertheless it should not be obeyed without exception. First of all, besides five years, other time period may also be reasonable. Consider the example of the U.S. presidential election. As it is known to all, it is held every four years, and each president can hold his or her position for at most eight years. And I think this is also a significantly good system, for it ensures the vitality in American politics while encourages the excellent governor to prevail their idea. Furthermore, in certain situation the leader can be stable, as it did in the case of Alan Greenspan, the 13th Chairman of the Federal Reserve, who has been in the office for about 20 years. When there are only few people competent for the job, or the policy made should keep steady, it is sometimes necessary, and even desirable, for the leaders remain unchanged.
In sum, to guarantee success, any organization should revitalize through new leadership. Admittedly an alternation for every five years is a good idea; other reasonable methods can also lead to success. Yet this is not the golden rule and can be invalid in some special occasion.
]]>Argument238 涓嶉檺鏃?&& 鏀逛簡涓涓嬶紝姹傛媿銆?/title>http://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/archive/2008/08/03/57909.htmlFreePeterFreePeterSun, 03 Aug 2008 14:28:00 GMThttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/archive/2008/08/03/57909.htmlhttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/comments/57909.htmlhttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/archive/2008/08/03/57909.html#Feedback0http://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/comments/commentRss/57909.htmlhttp://m.shnenglu.com/FreePeter/services/trackbacks/57909.htmlTOPIC: ARGUMENT238 - The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of Mira Vista College to the college's board of trustees.
"At nearby Green Mountain College, which has more business courses and more job counselors than does Mira Vista College, 90 percent of last year's graduating seniors had job offers from prospective employers. But at Mira Vista College last year, only 70 percent of the seniors who informed the placement office that they would be seeking employment had found full-time jobs within three months after graduation, and only half of these graduates were employed in their major field of study. To help Mira Vista's graduates find employment, we must offer more courses in business and computer technology and hire additional job counselors to help students with their resumés and interviewing skills." DATE: 2008-8-2 20:36:33
鎻愮翰錛?br>1. 緇熻鏁版嵁涓嶅彲闈狅紝涓ゆ墍瀛︽牎鐨勫氨涓氱巼涓嶅彲姣旇緝銆?br>2. 璁╂鏀誨嚮錛屾湁鍏朵粬鍘熷洜鍙互瀵艱嚧鎵懼伐浣滅殑涓嶅悓銆?br>3. 鍐嶆璁╂錛孧VC涓嶄竴瀹氳兘澶熺収鎼珿MC鐨勭粡楠屻?br> In this memo Mira Vista College (MVC)'s president recommends that in order to help MVC's graduates find job, MVC should provide more courses in business and computer technology and more job counselors. To support this recommendation, the president points out that Green Mountain College (GMC) has more business courses and more counselors. The president also indicate(鍙互鐢╥ndicate琛ㄧず鎸囧嚭涔堬紵) that GMC has higher employment rate according to statistics. However, it is problematic in several respects, rendering the argument unconvincing as it stands.
To begin with, the president fails to assure me that the statistic of MVC accurately reflects the employment rate. Without evidence that these seniors related to the statistic can represent the students of whole college, it is hasty to draw any conclusions about the rate. Perhaps it is most of such kind of students who felt unlikely to find a job that inform the office. Also, the president does not offer what kind of jobs the 90 percent of the GMC’s last year’s graduates find, perhaps the jobs they found are not as better as MVC’s. Furthermore, the president did not provide data about how long do students usually find their job. It is entirely possible that students need more time than three months to find a satisfied job. All those make the employment rates of two schools incomparable. Thus the president cannot conclude that GMC’s graduates are more likely to find job.
Even I concede that it is easier for GMC's graduates to find a job, the recommendation relies on the assumption that offering certain more courses and advisors was responsible for the higher job-found rate of GMC. The president overlooks other possible causes. For example, perhaps GMC's students have higher score than MVC's students, or perhaps GMC has better teachers. Either scenario would provide an alternative explanation for the difference of two colleges' graduates when they are looking for a job. It is also possible that although MVC has more such courses and advisors, since GMC has fewer students, which causes GMC has the same, or even more courses and advisors per each student.
Finally, even assuming that it is because of certain courses and counselors that make the GMC's graduates easier to be employed, the president fails to consider possible differences between GMC and MVC that might bring about a different result. For instance, MVC has been famous for other majors, such as physics, architecture. Therefore the future students of MVC are less interested in business courses. In this case, students will found the new offered courses tedious. Thus it will not take effect.
In sum, the president has not convinced me that it will help MVC's students to find a job after taking these measures. To bolster the argument, the president must offer more evidence which can prove that MVC's students are hard to find a job. To better assess the argument, I would also need to know some details of GMC and MVC; particularly, I would need to know the capabilities and interests of MVC's students.